Department of Economics
University of Minnesota Phone-(612) 625-0941
4-101 Hanson Hall (off 4-179) Fed Phone (612) 204-5528
1925 Fourth Street South Fax: (612) 624-0209
Minneapolis, MN 55455
Homepage http://www.econ.umn.edu/~vr0j/index.html
http://www.caerp.com
Department of Economics, University of Minnesota,
Tue and 14:30-15:45 Hanson Hall 4-170. Off Hours:
Before and after class and by appointment.
http://www.econ.umn.edu/~vr0j/ec8501-09/, email:
vr0j@umn.edu,
Phone-(612) 625-0941 Fax: (612) 624-0209
Fed Phone (612) 204-5528
TA, Manuel Macera , Office Hours: .
Recitation time is Tuesdays
4-5:15.
macer001@umn.edu
We finished search and the course. We
did so by discussing continuous time and how to pose the
difference equation that governs unemployment and how to
get endogenous vacancy creation and a wage through
bargaining.
May 5.
We started search. We looked at the
decision problem of the worker. We started continuous time.
April 30.
We talked about OLG models. Both
from a historic, monetary theory point of view and from
a modern, usefull recursicve point of view. We define
RCE for OLG economies and talked of how it can
accommodate many details of life as we know it.
April 28.
I went over the Romer growth model
with intermediate goods monopolistic competition and
innovation industry.
April 23.
I finished Ind Eq. First by
deriving a quitting condition when productivity is
Markovian. We talked about stochastic dominance. We then
posed endogenous state variables (adjustment costs in
labor) and we discussed things like skilled and
unskilled labor and how we could use these things to
assess some policies. I started growth discussing AK
models, human capital models, externality in capital
models and exogenous growth models all of which I will
assume that you are familiar with.
April 21.
We had the midterm. I went over
industry equilibria and how to get an endogenous
distribution of firms. We had the free entry
condition.
April 16.
We finished talking about the two
country model with shocks. I reviewed the basic notions
of measure theory that we need and that were discussed
with Manuel at the beginning of the class. We started
Competitive Industry Equilibria.
April 14.
We looked at the Lucas tree and
priced all securities. We derived prices for one period
ahead securities and for trees. We looked at the general
way of pricing all kinds of assets. We also looked at
the recursive implementation of the model economy where
firms own 1 unit of land for which there is no market
and accumulate capital while households trade shares in
firms and receive dividends. We started discussing the
two country model with shocks.
April 9.
We looked at the recursive
implementation of economies with shocks with Arrow
securities that pay in capital goods. We discussed how
it compares with the case without such securities. We
then discussed the FOCs of that model and how the
envelope theorem simpliefies things. We also talked even
if briefly about the pricing of options and about how to
obtain decision rules by successive approximations in a
similar manner to that in which we take advantage of the
contractions mapping theorem to obtain value
functions.
April 7.
We looked at the growth model with
aggregate shocks. We talked about how to go from the
social planner problem to the sequence of markets
equilibrium. And we started talking about recursive
equilibrium. State contingent one period ahead
securities are key.
April 2.
We looked at economies with two
types of agents differing in labor earnings and
wealth.
March 31.
We defined Recursive Comp Equil. We
started looking at particular non optimal or multiple
agent economies. The first one was an economy with fixed
government spending and lump sum taxes, then we switched
to capital income taxes. The third economy we looked at
added debt.
March 26.
We discussed how to construct the
objects that allow us to apply the 2nd Welfare
theorem. We then defined a Seq of Mkts Eq and built one
from the objects delivered by the 2nd Welfare
Theorem. We started with the definition of over
Recursive Comp Eq (RCE).
March 24.
We talked about the
differences between equilibrium and Pareto Optima and
what role does the latter play in Macro. We argue that
an equilibrium concept is a tool to pick outocomes
(allocations). We went over the logic that allows to
look at Social Planner allocations to see what sequence
of markets equilibria predict.
Course Description.
This course complements 8105-8107. In my view, the ultimate goal of
this course is to learn to use a variety of models that can be used to
give quantitative answers to a variety of economic questions by
producing allocations in the form of model generated data that can be
meaningfully related to actual data. In this course most (if not all)
of the material will be studied from the strict point of view of the
theory, so we will not look at data in any serious manner nor at
solving the models with the computer. The emphasis will be on
economic rigor, i.e. the target is to learn tools that will be
useful later in a variety of contexts. The course, then, is not a
survey of topics in macroeconomics. When some specific topic is
addressed the objective is not to give a review of known results but
rather to give an example of how an issue is addressed and of how
tools are used.
There will be recitations once a week. These will be used
either to introduce some mathematical apparatus that we need,
to solve homeworks, or to explore issues related to those
presented in class. The material covered in recitations
constitutes part of the required curriculum.
Homeworks and Grades
In the context of the course some homework will be assigned.
Sometimes I will ask you to prove something during a lecture,
sometimes they will be posted in the homepage. These problems are not
required but will give you an idea of what is expected for the exams,
and especially for the prelim. The grades will be based 30% on a
midterm, 60% on a final that will take place the last day of class
and 10% on class participation Manuel will give you feedback regarding
the homeworks.
Textbooks and papers
Besides those used and recommended by my colleagues, there is a good
little book (out of print actually) that is useful,
Harris, [1987]. The papers that I cite (in a very incomplete form
below) are not to be read in general, although some students may find
them useful. First year is to learn tools, not to read papers.
Preliminary List of Material to Cover
This list is of material that I want to go over. The first few items
you have seen in a very similar way, so I will go very fast over it,
but I find it very useful to go over them again.
Introduction
Equilibrium. What is its meaning.
Competitive equilibrium in the growth model. Taking
advantage of the welfare theorems.
A stochastic version of the growth model. What are complete
markets? What are one period ahead Arrow-securities? How to define
Competitive equilibrium in stochastic growth model.
Arrow Debreu.
Sequence of Markets.
Recursive Competitive Equilibrium.
Attacking recursive equilibria directly.
Non-optimal Economies.
An economy with an externality in production.
An economy with public expenditures, income taxes and
a period by period balanced budget constraint.
An economy with public expenditures, income taxes and
a present value balanced budget constraint.
An economy with money some form of cash in advance.
Normative versus Positive thinking: Optimal policy. Optimal
Time-consistent policy. Markov equilibria
with sequences of governments.
An Economy with decentralized bargaining in labor markets.
Multiple Agents Complete Markets Economies.
An economy with two types of agents differing in
skills and/or wealth.
Overlapping Generations with variable demographics.
A hybrid. The exponential population, exponential
aging, model.
Fertility in the utility.
Multiplicity of Equilibria.
References
COOLEY, T. F., AND E. C. PRESCOTT (1995): "Economic Growth
and Business Cycles," in Frontiers of Business Cycle Research, ed. by
T. F. Cooley, chap. 1. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
EPSTEIN, L. G., AND S. ZIN (1989): "Substitution, Risk
Aversion and the Temporal Behavior of Asset Returns: a Theoretical
Framework," Econometrica, 57, 937-969.
HARRIS, M. (1987): Dynamic Economic Analysis. Oxford
University Press.
LJUNGQVIST, L., AND T. SARGENT (2000): Recursive
Macroeconomic Theory. MIT Press.
LUCAS, R. E. (1978): "Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy,"
Econometrica, 46(6), 1429-1445.
STOKEY, N. L., AND E. C. LUCAS, R. E. WITH PRESCOTT
(1989): Recursive Methods in Economic Dynamics. Harvard University
Press.
File translated from
TEX
by
TTH,
version 3.80. On 23 Mar 2008, 22:31.